| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 254 | |
| 221. |  | FERREIRA, V.; PIANZZOLA, M. J.; VILARÓ, F.; GALVÁN, G.; TONDO, M. L.; RODRÍGUEZ, M. V.; ORELLANO, E.; SIR, M. I. Mecanismos de resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en clones avanzados del Programa de Mejoramiento Genético de papa. [o6*]. Bloque 2: Mejoramiento por resistencia a enfermedades. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 4., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 2., 1° setiembre, 2017, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2017. p. 35. [o6*]: *Trabajo ya presentado.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 224. | | BOSCHI, F.; VILARO, F.; GALVÁN, G.; MURCHIO, S.; FERREIRA, V.; FERENCZI, A.; ZIPFEL, C.; DALLA RIZZA, M. Percepción del daño en eventos transgénicos de papa-EFR: evaluación de la resistencia a Ralstonia solanacearum. In: JORNADA NACIONAL DE FITOPATOLOGÍA, 3; JORNADA NACIONAL DE PROTECCIÓN VEGETAL, 1., 3 SETIEMBRE 2015, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. Libro de Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay) : SUFIT, 2015. p. 16| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 225. | | VILARÓ, F.; VICENTE, E.; RODRÍGUEZ, G.; PEREIRA, G.; SPINA, W.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; REGGIO, A.; IBÁÑEZ, F.; LADO, J. Nuevas variedades de boniato. [Rev.Noticiero CNFR] Noticiero, 2009, no.16, p.51-53| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 226. | | DENIS, N.; FERREIRA, V.; RODRÍGUEZ, G.; NÚÑEZ, N.; VILARÓ, F.; VALLE, D.; GAIERO, P.; SIRI, M.I. O8. Caracterización de resistencia a sarna en germoplasma de papa y selección de genotipos contrastantes para análisis metagenómico en la geocaulósfera. [Presentación oral]. Presentaciones orales. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología (SUFIT). Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 7., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 5., 10 noviembre 2023, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. 30 años SUFIT, 1993-2023. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2023. p. 22. Financiamiento: Proyecto CSIC Grupos I+D 2019-2023: "Bacterias fitopatógenas: mecanismos de resistencia hospedera y de interacción planta patógeno". Proyecto CSIC Grupos I+D 2023-2027: "Estudios integrados para el manejo de patógenos...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 227. | | Szwedzki, D.; Mahler, S.G.; Dellacassa, E.; Carballo, S.; Vilaró, F.; Docampo, R.; Arboleya, J.; Moyna, P. Onion pungency evaluation and its correlation with farming conditions ln: International Symposium on Edible Alliaceae, 1 : 1994 : Mendoza, Argentina Abstracts. Mendoza (Argentina): ISHS, 1994. p111| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Salto Grande; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 229. | | FORT, S.; FERREIRA, V.; MURCHIO, S.; SCHVARTZMAN, C.; GALVÁN, G.A.; VILARÓ, F.; SIRI, M.I.; DALLA RIZZA, M. Potato plants transformed with the Arabidopsis EF-Tu receptor (EFR) show restricted pathogen colonization and enhanced bacterial with resistance under conditions resembling natural field infections. [Plantas de papa transformadas con el receptor de EF-Tu (EFR) de Arabidopsis presentan una colonización restringida del patógeno y mayor resistencia a la marchitez Bacteriana bajo condiciones semejantes a la infección natural de campo]. Special Issue X Encuentro Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Biotecnología Agropecuaria; XII Simposio REDBIO Argentina. Roca, William, Ed. 12 al 15 de noviembre de 2019, Montevideo, Uruguay. Agrociencia Uruguay 2020, v. 24, no. NE2, Article 413. DOI: 10.31285/AGRO.24.413 16 p. 2301-1548 Article history: Received 29 Jun. 2020 // Accepted 28 Sep. 2020 // Published 17 Dec 2020.
Comité científico editor:
Dra. Marisa López-Bilbao (INTA, Hurlingham, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina); Dra. Sandra Sharry (Universidad...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 230. | | GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; VICENTE, E.; ROSSI, C.; VILARO, F.; MANDL, F.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; MANZZIONI, A.; GIMÉNEZ, G. El sistema de producción de semillas hortícolas de INIA Revista INIA Uruguay, 2010, no. 21 p. 32-35 (Revista INIA; 21)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 231. | | GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; VICENTE, E.; ROSSI, C.; VILARO, F.; MANDL, A.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; MANZZIONI, A.; GIMÉNEZ, G. El sistema de producción de semillas hortícolas de INIA Revista INIA Uruguay, 2010, no. 21 p. 32-35| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 232. | | CAPRA, G.; ALBIN, A.; RUGGIA, A.; GARCIA, F.; AGUERRE, V.; VILARO, F.; GILSANZ, J.C.; ARBOLEYA, J.; RACHETTI, M. Tecnología para la producción familiar del departamento de Rocha: avances del acuerdo de trabajo INIA-CNFR Revista INIA, 2009, no. 18, p. 40-44| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 233. | | CARRASCO-LETELIER, L.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; D´OTTONE, F.; RESQUÍN, F.; SCOZ, R.; VILARO, F.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; VICENTE, E.; TERRA, J.A. Balance energético de cadenas agro-industriales de interés para la producción de bioenergías. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2013, no. 32, p. 46-50 (Revista INIA; 32)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 234. | | OLIVERA, A.; PIPPOLO, D.; CROSA, M.J.; SKERL, V.; PACHECO, P.; VILARÓ, F.; ZACCARI, F.; OSORIO, F.; SILVEIRA, D.; LEMA, P. Cadenas hortifrutícolas: agregando valor. El País Agropecuario, 2012, v. 18, no. 211, p. 24-25.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 235. | | VICENTE, E.; VILARO, F.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; GALVÁN, G.; GONZÁLEZ, H.; SPINA, W.; REGGIO, A.; IBÁÑEZ, F.; PEREIRA, G.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M. Cultivares de cebolla obtenidos por el mejoramiento genético nacional Revista INIA Uruguay, 2010, no. 22, p. 25-29 (Revista INIA; 22)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 236. | | BOSCHI, F.; SCHVARTZMAN, C.; MURCHIO, S.; FERREIRA, V.; SIRI, M.; GALVÁN, G.; SMOKER, M.; STRANSFEL, L.; ZYPFEL, C.; VILARÓ, F.; DALLA RIZZA, M. Enhanced bacterial wilt resistance in potato through expression of arabidopsis efr and introgression of quantitative resistance from solanum commersonii. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, Volume 8, 25 September 2017, Article number 1642. OPEN ACCESS. THIS ARTICLE IS PART OF THE RESEARCH TOPIC: Plant Pathogenic Ralstonia spp. From the Field to the Lab and Back Again: mechanisms of pathogen virulence and host resistance, population biology, community ecology and strategies for bacterial...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 237. | | VICENTE, E.; CARRATO, A.; SILVERA SOTO, S.; LADO, J.; MACÍAS, D.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; VILARO, F.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; CARREGA, G.; IBÁÑEZ, F. Desarrollo de variedades de boniato aptas para congelado en la zona litoral norte del Uruguay Revista INIA Uruguay, 2011, no.27 p. 37-40 (Revista INIA; 27)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Salto Grande. |
| |
| 238. | | CROSA, M.J.; ELICHALT, M.; SKERL, V.; CADENAZZI, M.; OLAZÁBAL, L.; SILVA, R.; SURUBÚ, G.; TORRES, M.; VILARO, F.; ESTELLANO, G. Chips de papa, la fritura en vacío y beneficios para la salud. INNOTEC, Revista del Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay. 2014, no.9, p.70-74.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 239. | | VIERA, L.; ALCOBA, F.; GONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, P.; RODRÍGUEZ, G.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; FERREIRA, V.; GALVÁN, G.; SIRI, M.I.; GAIERO, P.; VILARÓ, F. Evaluación de la resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en germoplasma avanzado de Papa (Solanum tuberosum). 153. (resúmen). Áreas temáticas: Genética. In: Physiological Mini Reviews, 2022, volume 15, Special Issue: III (3er) Congreso Nacional de Biociencias Octubre 2022, Montevideo, Uruguay. p.151-152. Resumen publicado en las jornadas de BIOCIENCIAS: II Jornadas Binacionales Argentina-Uruguay; III Congreso Nacional 2022 "Ciencia para el desarrollo sustentable".| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 240. | | CARRASCO-LETELIER, L.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; RESQUÍN, F.; RACHID, C.; D´OTTONE, F.; TERRA, J.A.; SCOZ, R.; VILARO, F.; SALDIAS, R.; OTEGUI, O.; SOUTO, G. Evaluando la sostenibilidad energética de las agroenergías Revista INIA Uruguay, 2011, no. 27, p. 48-51 (Revista INIA; 27)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 254 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
24/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/09/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - A |
|
Autor : |
VELAZCO, J.I.; MAYER, D.G.; ZIMMERMAN, S.; HEGARTY, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ IGNACIO VELAZCO DE LOS REYES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Use of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal, 2015, v. 10 (1) p. 25-33. |
|
ISBN : |
10.1017/s1751731115001603 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 September 2014; Accepted 29 June 2015. |
|
Contenido : |
Methods to measure enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual ruminants in their production environment are required to validate emission inventories and verify mitigation claims. Estimates of daily methane production (DMP) based on consolidated short-term emission measurements are developing, but method verification is required. Two cattle experiments were undertaken to test the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate did not differ from DMP measured in respiration chambers (RC). Short-term emission rates were obtained from a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) unit, which measured emission rate while cattle consumed a dispensed supplement. In experiment 1 (Expt. 1), four non-lactating cattle (LW = 518 kg) were adapted for 18 days then measured for six consecutive periods. Each period consisted of 2 days of ad libitum intake and GEM emission measurement followed by 1 day in the RC. A prototype GEM unit releasing water as an attractant (GEM water) was also evaluated in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 (Expt. 2) was a larger study based on similar design with 10 cattle (LW = 365 kg), adapted for 21 days and GEM measurement was extended to 3 days in each of the six periods. In Expt. 1, there was no difference in DMP estimated by the GEM unit relative to the RC (209.7 v. 215.1 g CH4/day) and no difference between these methods in methane yield (MY, 22.7 v. 23.7 g CH4/kg of dry matter intake, DMI). In Expt. 2, the correlation between GEM and RC measures of DMP and MY were assessed using 95% confidence intervals, with no difference in DMP or MY between
methods and high correlations between GEM and RC measures for DMP ( r = 0.85; 215 v. 198 g CH4/day SEM = 3.0) and for MY ( r = 0.60; 23.8 v. 22.1 g CH4/kg DMI SEM = 0.42). When data from both experiments was combined neither DMP nor MY differed between GEM- and RC-based measures ( P >0.05). GEM water-based estimates of DMP and MY were lower than RC and GEM ( P <0.05). Cattle accessed the GEM water unit with similar frequency to the GEM unit (2.8 v. 3.5 times/day, respectively) but eructation frequency was reduced from 1.31 times/min (GEM) to once every 2.6 min (GEM water). These studies confirm the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate using GEM does not differ from measures of DMP obtained from RCs. Further, combining many short-term measures of methane production rate during supplement consumption provides an estimate of DMP, which can be usefully applied in estimating MY. MenosMethods to measure enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual ruminants in their production environment are required to validate emission inventories and verify mitigation claims. Estimates of daily methane production (DMP) based on consolidated short-term emission measurements are developing, but method verification is required. Two cattle experiments were undertaken to test the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate did not differ from DMP measured in respiration chambers (RC). Short-term emission rates were obtained from a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) unit, which measured emission rate while cattle consumed a dispensed supplement. In experiment 1 (Expt. 1), four non-lactating cattle (LW = 518 kg) were adapted for 18 days then measured for six consecutive periods. Each period consisted of 2 days of ad libitum intake and GEM emission measurement followed by 1 day in the RC. A prototype GEM unit releasing water as an attractant (GEM water) was also evaluated in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 (Expt. 2) was a larger study based on similar design with 10 cattle (LW = 365 kg), adapted for 21 days and GEM measurement was extended to 3 days in each of the six periods. In Expt. 1, there was no difference in DMP estimated by the GEM unit relative to the RC (209.7 v. 215.1 g CH4/day) and no difference between these methods in methane yield (MY, 22.7 v. 23.7 g CH4/kg of dry matter intake, DMI). In Expt. 2, the correl... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; GAS METANO; GREENHOUSE GASES; MEASUREMENT; METHANE. |
|
Thesagro : |
GANADO; GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO; MEDIDAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
T01 Polución |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03343naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1053983
005 2018-09-19
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aVELAZCO, J.I.
245 $aUse of short-term breath measures to estimate daily methane production by cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
500 $aArticle history: Received 30 September 2014; Accepted 29 June 2015.
520 $aMethods to measure enteric methane (CH4) emissions from individual ruminants in their production environment are required to validate emission inventories and verify mitigation claims. Estimates of daily methane production (DMP) based on consolidated short-term emission measurements are developing, but method verification is required. Two cattle experiments were undertaken to test the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate did not differ from DMP measured in respiration chambers (RC). Short-term emission rates were obtained from a GreenFeed Emissions Monitoring (GEM) unit, which measured emission rate while cattle consumed a dispensed supplement. In experiment 1 (Expt. 1), four non-lactating cattle (LW = 518 kg) were adapted for 18 days then measured for six consecutive periods. Each period consisted of 2 days of ad libitum intake and GEM emission measurement followed by 1 day in the RC. A prototype GEM unit releasing water as an attractant (GEM water) was also evaluated in Expt. 1. Experiment 2 (Expt. 2) was a larger study based on similar design with 10 cattle (LW = 365 kg), adapted for 21 days and GEM measurement was extended to 3 days in each of the six periods. In Expt. 1, there was no difference in DMP estimated by the GEM unit relative to the RC (209.7 v. 215.1 g CH4/day) and no difference between these methods in methane yield (MY, 22.7 v. 23.7 g CH4/kg of dry matter intake, DMI). In Expt. 2, the correlation between GEM and RC measures of DMP and MY were assessed using 95% confidence intervals, with no difference in DMP or MY between methods and high correlations between GEM and RC measures for DMP ( r = 0.85; 215 v. 198 g CH4/day SEM = 3.0) and for MY ( r = 0.60; 23.8 v. 22.1 g CH4/kg DMI SEM = 0.42). When data from both experiments was combined neither DMP nor MY differed between GEM- and RC-based measures ( P >0.05). GEM water-based estimates of DMP and MY were lower than RC and GEM ( P <0.05). Cattle accessed the GEM water unit with similar frequency to the GEM unit (2.8 v. 3.5 times/day, respectively) but eructation frequency was reduced from 1.31 times/min (GEM) to once every 2.6 min (GEM water). These studies confirm the hypothesis that DMP estimated by averaging multiple short-term breath measures of methane emission rate using GEM does not differ from measures of DMP obtained from RCs. Further, combining many short-term measures of methane production rate during supplement consumption provides an estimate of DMP, which can be usefully applied in estimating MY.
650 $aGANADO
650 $aGASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO
650 $aMEDIDAS
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aGAS METANO
653 $aGREENHOUSE GASES
653 $aMEASUREMENT
653 $aMETHANE
700 1 $aMAYER, D.G.
700 1 $aZIMMERMAN, S.
700 1 $aHEGARTY, S.
773 $tAnimal, 2015$gv. 10 (1) p. 25-33.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
